By Phill Boas
Elat had been sitting for nearly an hour with newspapers spread on the kitchen table. His wife, initially interested in some of the articles he had read her out loud, now wanted to get on with her day’s chores. As he began his daily rant about one of the articles she gently kissed him on the forehead and, lifting his arm suggested that now would be an excellent time for him to take his newspapers and retire to his study where he could give them uninterrupted attention.
Elat knew that this was a suggestion he should take. He was fuming over the blatant lying and undisguised self-interest that was at the centre of the political news of the day as it reported about another party replacement of a sitting Prime Minister who had actually been voted in by the Australian people. The challenger had clearly been supported by a colleague who had blatantly lied about his future intentions. Elat began to muse quietly to himself about the way Parliamentarians consistently behaved badly.
The note on the Speakers lectern in both Houses of the Australian Parliament simply read:
“All elected representatives of both Houses of Parliament with be subject to a regime of behavioural inducements. These will continue until the insensitive, childlike, self-interested, unstatesmanlike and dysfunctional behaviour of members has ceased and both Houses of this Parliament are acting in the interests of the Australian People both long and short term.”
It was simply signed: A spokesperson for the Australian People.
The Speakers of both houses assumed it was a joke and simply put it aside.
Note:
Starting that day, during Question Time, with the House in session; whenever a member issued a facetious comment directed against a member from their opposition the member would receive a splat of very nice tasting marshmallow like substance—about an inch in diameter—on the forehead, which needed to be wiped off but could, the Speaker informed members, he had been informed, be safely eaten. It appeared to have been flicked from the other side of the house but the exact location of the person responsible could never be detected.
Immediately after this began there were strong complaints from each recipient and the speaker would find a note on his rostrum naming the childlike or otherwise inappropriate behaviour for which the small sweet projectile had been sent.
It was freaky, but, within the hour, members realised that whatever was the source of these missives/missiles they were unable to be prevented and with increasingly fewer backslidings, both houses began to settle down to a new more adult form of engagement.
The same thing happened when a member lied or misrepresented their position or misinformed someone on what they had or had not said or done.
Within a month, the politicians of the Australian Parliament were behaving in entirely new and refreshing ways. Promises were not being made because every lying promise or potentially unfulfillable promise received a splat of the delicious marshmallowy projectile coming from no-one-knew-where.
Misinformation received the same treatment as did a considerable suite of undiplomatic behaviours and behaviours motivated by self-interest rather than community or societal concerns. Politicians were being publicly shamed and forced to take account of the short, medium and long term consequences of their actions and commitments. They were also being strongly discouraged from pursuing their personal or party political and sectional interests when they conflicted with the overall public good.
A new era was being created in the Australian parliament amongst its political denizens.
Good social engineering was the final thought Elat had as his wife tapped him gently on the shoulder and he blinked and realised she was putting his tea down beside his newspapers.
Elat #30
31/08/2018